A Regular Cosine Series with Odd $k$

Consider the Fourier series of the unit-amplitude triangular wave. As is well known it is given by the cosine series


\begin{displaymath}
S_{\rm c}
=
-\,
\frac{8}{\pi^{2}}
\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}
\frac{1}{(2j+1)^{2}}\,
\cos[(2j+1)\theta].
\end{displaymath}

The corresponding FC series is then


\begin{displaymath}
\bar{S}_{\rm c}
=
-\,
\frac{8}{\pi^{2}}
\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}
\frac{1}{(2j+1)^{2}}\,
\sin[(2j+1)\theta],
\end{displaymath}

the complex $S_{v}$ series is given by


\begin{displaymath}
S_{v}
=
-\,
\frac{8}{\pi^{2}}
\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}
\frac{1}{(2j+1)^{2}}\,
v^{2j+1},
\end{displaymath}

and the complex power series $S_{z}$ is given by


\begin{displaymath}
S_{z}
=
-\,
\frac{8}{\pi^{2}}
\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}
\frac{1}{(2j+1)^{2}}\,
z^{2j+1}.
\end{displaymath}

The ratio test tells us that the disk of convergence of $S_{z}$ is the unit disk. If we consider the inner analytic function $w(z)$ within this disk we observe that $w(0)=0$, as expected. We have for the function and its derivative

\begin{eqnarray*}
w(z)
& = &
-\,
\frac{8}{\pi^{2}}
\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}
\fr...
...frac{8}{\pi^{2}}
\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}
\frac{1}{2j+1}\,
z^{2j}.
\end{eqnarray*}


Observe that we have for the derivative the particular value


\begin{displaymath}
\frac{dw}{dz}(0)
=
-\,
\frac{8}{\pi^{2}}.
\end{displaymath}

We may now multiply by $z$ and differentiate again, to obtain

\begin{eqnarray*}
\frac{d}{dz}
\left[
z\,
\frac{dw(z)}{dz}
\right]
& = &
...
...\\
& = &
-\,
\frac{8}{\pi^{2}}
\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}
z^{2j}.
\end{eqnarray*}


This is a geometrical series and therefore we may write this expression in closed form,

\begin{eqnarray*}
\frac{d}{dz}
\left[
z\,
\frac{dw(z)}{dz}
\right]
& = &
...
...8}{\pi^{2}}\,
\left(
\frac{1}{1+z}
+
\frac{1}{1-z}
\right).
\end{eqnarray*}


It is now very simple to integrate in order to obtain the derivative of $w(z)$ in closed form, remembering that we should have for it the value $-8/\pi^{2}$ at $z=0$,

\begin{eqnarray*}
z\,
\frac{dw(z)}{dz}
& = &
-\,
\frac{4}{\pi^{2}}\,
\left...
... &
-\,
\frac{4}{\pi^{2}}\,
\ln\!\left(\frac{1+z}{1-z}\right).
\end{eqnarray*}


This is the logarithmic derivative of $w(z)$, which is another inner analytic function, and it should be noted that it is proportional to the analytic function $w_{\rm sq}(z)$ for the case of the standard square wave,


\begin{displaymath}
z\,
\frac{dw(z)}{dz}
=
-\,
\frac{2}{\pi}\,
w_{\rm sq}(z).
\end{displaymath}

We get for the derivative of $w(z)$


\begin{displaymath}
\frac{dw(z)}{dz}
=
-\,
\frac{4}{\pi^{2}}\,
\frac{1}{z}\,
\ln\!\left(\frac{1+z}{1-z}\right).
\end{displaymath}

This function has two borderline hard singularities at the points where the triangular wave is not differentiable. Presumably $w(z)$ has two borderline soft singularities at these points. It seems that the second integration cannot be done explicitly because the indefinite integral of the function above cannot be expressed as a finite combination of elementary functions. We are thus unable to write $w(z)$ in closed form. However, we may still obtain partial confirmation of our results by using the closed form for the derivative of $w(z)$. If we differentiate the Fourier series of the triangular wave with respect to $\theta$ we get


\begin{displaymath}
\frac{dS_{\rm c}}{d\theta}
=
\frac{8}{\pi^{2}}
\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}
\frac{1}{2j+1}\,
\sin[(2j+1)\theta].
\end{displaymath}

This is equal to $2/\pi$ times the Fourier series for the standard square wave, given in Subsection C.2. On the other hand, if we use $z=\rho\exp(\mbox{\boldmath$\imath$}\theta)$ and consider the complex derivative of $w(z)$ taken in the direction of $\theta$, we have


\begin{displaymath}
\frac{dw(z)}{d\theta}
=
\mbox{\boldmath$\imath$}
z\,
\frac{dw(z)}{dz}.
\end{displaymath}

We have therefore

\begin{eqnarray*}
\frac{dw(z)}{d\theta}
& = &
-\mbox{\boldmath$\imath$}\,
\f...
... &
-\mbox{\boldmath$\imath$}\,
\frac{2}{\pi}\,
w_{\rm sq}(z).
\end{eqnarray*}


The factor of $-\mbox{\boldmath$\imath$}$ simply implements the necessary exchanges of real and imaginary parts, to account for the exchange of sines and cosines in the process of differentiation, and the factor of $2/\pi$ corrects the normalization. We see therefore that at least the derivative of the Fourier series at the unit circle is represented correctly by the inner analytic function $w(z)$.