The sometimes complicated questions of convergence of Fourier series can be mapped onto the convergence of Taylor series of analytic functions. The modes of convergence of DP Fourier series can be classified according to the singularity structure of the corresponding inner analytic functions. The extreme cases of strong convergence and strong divergence are easily identified and classified, as was shown in the previous paper [1]. Simple tests can be used to identify these cases.
Weakly convergent DP Fourier series present a much more delicate and difficult problem. It can be shown that all these cases are translated, in the complex formalism, into the behavior of inner analytic functions and their Taylor series at the rim of the maximum disk of convergence of these series, which in this case is the unit circle. The treatment of this case required the introduction of a classification scheme for singularities of inner analytic functions. These were classified as either soft or hard, depending on the behavior of the inner analytic functions near them, and subsequently by integer indices giving the degrees of either softness or hardness of the singularities. Of particular importance are the degrees which we named as borderline soft and borderline hard.
This classification scheme led to the concept of integral-differential
chains of inner analytic functions, which were needed in order to relate
the classification of singularities with a corresponding classification of
modes of convergence of the series associated to the functions. Definite
results were obtained only for a certain subset of all possible such
chains, consisting of regular chains in which the series is an
extended monotonic series. This defines a certain class of series and
corresponding functions. With the limitation that we must stay within this
class, it was shown that the existence and level of convergence of DP
Fourier series is ruled by the nature of the dominant singularities of the
inner analytic functions which are located at the rim of their maximum
disk of convergence, which is the unit circle.
As a result of this classification, by constructing the inner analytic
function of a given DP Fourier series in this class, one can determine the
convergence of the series via the examination of the singularities of that
function. At a very basic level, one can determine whether the series is
strongly divergent or strongly convergent by simply determining the
position of possible singularities of the inner analytic function. This
leads to the three-pronged basic decision process: if there is a
singularity of any type within the open unit disk, then the series
is divergent everywhere; if there are no singularities within the closed
unit disk, then the
series converges everywhere to a
function; if there are one or more singularities on the unit circle, but
none within the open unit disk, then the convergence of the
series
is determined by the degree of hardness or of softness of the dominant
singularities on the unit circle.
The last alternative leads to another three-pronged decision process, this
time based on the type of the dominant singularities of the inner analytic
function found on the unit circle. According to the underlying structure
that was uncovered, at this finer level the decision structure leads to
the following basic alternatives: if the dominant singularities are soft
singularities, then the series converges absolutely and uniformly
everywhere; if they are borderline hard singularities, then the
series converges point-wise almost everywhere, but does not converge
absolutely; if they are hard singularities with degree of hardness
or
greater, then the series
diverges everywhere.
This classification scheme for all the modes of convergence, and of the
corresponding degrees of softness or hardness of the dominant
singularities, is illustrated in Table 1, which gives also
some additional information. By and large, as the singularities become
softer the series become more convergent over the unit circle, and
converge to smoother functions. Given the convergence mode of the
series, one can then derive the corresponding mode for the DP Fourier
series, which are also included in the table.
In terms of the analytic character of the limiting functions, at the most
basic level strongly convergent DP Fourier series converge to restrictions
to the whole unit circle of complex analytic functions, while
weakly convergent DP Fourier series converge to globally
functions
which are also sectionally
, where
is the degree of softness
of the dominant singularities on the unit circle. In the case in which the
dominant singularities are borderline hard, the series converge to
sectionally continuous and differentiable functions, which however are not
globally continuous. In addition to this, in the case in which the
dominant singularities are simple poles one may have representations of
singular objects such as the Dirac delta ``function'', as was shown in the
previous paper [1]. However, this last alternative has not yet
been explored in much detail.
Moreover, we presented the process of singularity factorization, through
which, given an arbitrary DP Fourier series, which can even be divergent
almost everywhere, one can construct from it other expressions involving
trigonometric series, that converge to the function that gave origin to
the given DP Fourier series. This works by the construction of a new
complex power series from the Taylor series of the corresponding
inner analytic function. We call these new series
the center
series of the series
that converges to the inner analytic function
associated to the original DP Fourier series. If the original series was
very weakly convergent, then this new series will have much better
convergence characteristics. Even if the original series is divergent one
can still construct expressions involving center series that converge to
the original function, in a piecewise fashion. In this way, a more
practical means of recovery of the original function is provided, if
compared to the explicit determination of the inner analytic function
in closed form, in order to enable one to take its limit to the
unit circle explicitly.
Several points are left open and represent interesting possibilities for
further development of the subject. One was presented in the previous
paper [1] and consists of the question of whether or not there
are real functions which generate strongly divergent DP Fourier series.
The conjecture is that there are none, in which case taking limits of
inner analytic functions from within the open unit disk would be
established as a process for the generation, almost everywhere on the unit
circle, of all real functions from which it is possible to define the
coefficients of a DP Fourier series. Another interesting question, posed
in this paper, is whether or not there are series with
coefficients
that behave as
with
and that converge everywhere on the unit circle. If there are, it would
be necessary to consider the extension of our classification scheme to
other classes of DP Fourier series.
Since an absolutely and uniformly convergent DP Fourier series usually
converges much faster than a non-absolutely and non-uniformly
convergent one, doing the
transformation can be of
enormous numerical advantage. One verifies that, the slower the
convergence of
, caused by a value of
closer to zero when
, the more advantageous is the use of the series
. Near the special points the gain is more limited, but it still
exists. For simple well-known series such as the square wave, with
coefficients that go to zero as
, which is the fastest possible
approach within the
class, on average over the whole domain,
and for the higher levels of numerical precision required of the results,
the speedup can be as high as
or more, as we will show
elsewhere [3].