An inner analytic function is simply a complex function which
is analytic within the open unit disk. An inner analytic function that has
the additional property that
is a proper inner analytic
function. The angular derivative of an inner analytic function is
defined by
![]() |
(1) |
By construction we have that
, for all
. The angular primitive of an inner analytic function is defined by
![]() |
(2) |
By construction we have that
, for all
. In terms
of a system of polar coordinates
on the complex plane,
these two analytic operations are equivalent to differentiation and
integration with respect to
, taken at constant
. These two
operations stay within the space of inner analytic functions, they also
stay within the space of proper inner analytic functions, and they are the
inverses of one another. Using these operations, and starting from any
proper inner analytic function
, one constructs an infinite
integral-differential chain of proper inner analytic functions,
![]() |
(3) |
Two different such integral-differential chains cannot ever intersect each
other. There is a single integral-differential chain of proper inner
analytic functions which is a constant chain, namely the null chain, in
which all members are the null function .
A general scheme for the classification of all possible singularities of
inner analytic functions is established. A singularity of an inner
analytic function at a point
on the unit circle is a soft singularity if the limit of
to that point exists and is
finite. Otherwise, it is a hard singularity. Angular integration
takes soft singularities to other soft singularities, and angular
differentiation takes hard singularities to other hard singularities.
Gradations of softness and hardness are then established. A hard singularity that becomes a soft one by means of a single angular integration is a borderline hard singularity, with degree of hardness zero. The degree of softness of a soft singularity is the number of angular differentiations that result in a borderline hard singularity, and the degree of hardness of a hard singularity is the number of angular integrations that result in a borderline hard singularity. Singularities which are either soft or borderline hard are integrable ones. Hard singularities which are not borderline hard are non-integrable ones.
Given an integrable real function on the unit circle, one can
construct from it a unique corresponding inner analytic function
.
Real functions are obtained through the
limit of the
real and imaginary parts of each such inner analytic function and, in
particular, the real function
is obtained from the real part
of
in this limit. The pair of real functions obtained from the real
and imaginary parts of one and the same inner analytic function are said
to be mutually Fourier-conjugate real functions.
Singularities of real functions can be classified in a way which is analogous to the corresponding complex classification. Integrable real functions are typically associated with inner analytic functions that have singularities which are either soft or at most borderline hard. This ends our synopsis.
When we discuss real functions in this paper, some properties will be globally assumed for these functions, just as was done in [#!CAoRFI!#]. These are rather weak conditions to be imposed on these functions, that will be in force throughout this paper. It is to be understood, without any need for further comment, that these conditions are valid whenever real functions appear in the arguments. These weak conditions certainly hold for any integrable real functions that are obtained as restrictions of corresponding inner analytic functions to the unit circle.
The most basic condition is that the real functions must be measurable in the sense of Lebesgue, with the usual Lebesgue measure [#!RARudin!#,#!RARoyden!#]. The second global condition we will impose is that the functions have no removable singularities. The third and last global condition is that the number of hard singularities on the unit circle be finite, and hence that they be all isolated from one another. There will be no limitation on the number of soft singularities.
The material contained in this paper is a development, reorganization and extension of some of the material found, sometimes still in rather rudimentary form, in the papers [#!FTotCPI!#,#!FTotCPII!#,#!FTotCPIII!#,#!FTotCPIV!#,#!FTotCPV!#].